Prolonged T-cell activation and long COVID symptoms independently associate with severe disease at 3 months in a UK cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients (preprint)

COVID-19 causes immune perturbations which may persist long-term, and patients frequently report ongoing symptoms for months after recovery. We assessed the extent and nature of immune activation at 3 months post hospital admission in patients with mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 and investigated whether immune activation associates with disease severity and long COVID. Patients with severe disease displayed persistent activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, based on expression of HLA-DR, CD38, Ki67 and granzyme B, but they lacked activation of other immune subsets. Elevated plasma levels of IL-4, IL-7, IL- 17 and TNF- were present in patients with severe compared to mild and/or moderate disease. Plasma from severe patients caused T-cells from healthy donors to upregulate IL-15R, suggesting that factors in the plasma of severe patients may increase T-cell responsiveness to IL-15-driven bystander" activation, which may drive persistent T-cell activation after severe COVID-19. Patients with severe disease reported a higher number of long COVID symptoms which correlated with the frequency of two subsets of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (CD4+ T-cell population 2 and CD8+ T-cell population 4; FDR p<0.05), however these associations were lost after adjusting for age, sex and disease severity. Our data suggests that persistent immune activation and long COVID correlate independently with severe disease.

Alterations in platelet proteome signature and impaired platelet integrin αIIbβ3 activation in patients with COVID-19 (preprint)

Background Patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of thrombosis, which is associated with altered platelet function and coagulopathy, contributing to excess mortality. Objectives We aimed to characterise the mechanism of altered platelet function in COVID-19 patients. Methods The platelet proteome, platelet functional responses and platelet-neutrophil aggregates were compared between patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and healthy control subjects using Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) proteomic analysis, Western blotting and flow cytometry. Results COVID-19 patients showed a different profile of platelet protein expression (858 altered out of 5773 quantified). Levels of COVID-19 plasma markers were enhanced in COVID-19 platelets. Gene ontology (GO) pathway analysis demonstrated that levels of granule secretory proteins were raised, whereas some platelet activation proteins, such as the thrombopoietin receptor and PKCalpha, were lowered. Basally, COVID-19 platelets showed enhanced phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure, with unaltered integrin alphaIIbBeta3 activation and P-selectin expression. Agonist-stimulated integrin alphaIIbBeta3 activation and PS exposure, but not P-selectin expression, were significantly decreased in COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 patients had high levels of platelet-neutrophil aggregates, even under basal conditions, compared to controls. This interaction was disrupted by blocking P-selectin, demonstrating that platelet P-selectin is critical for the interaction. Conclusions Overall, our data suggests the presence of two platelet populations in patients with COVID-19: one with circulating platelets with an altered proteome and reduced functional responses and another with P-selectin expressing neutrophil-associated platelets. Platelet driven thromboinflammation may therefore be one of the key factors enhancing the risk of thrombosis in COVID-19 patients.

A feasibility randomised trial comparing therapeutic thoracentesis to chest tube insertion for the management of pleural infection: results from the ACTion trial (preprint)

BackgroundPleural infection is a complex condition with a considerable healthcare burden. The average hospital stay for pleural infection is 14 days. Current standard of care defaults to chest tube insertion and intravenous antibiotics. There have been no randomised trials on the use of therapeutic thoracentesis (TT) for pleural fluid drainage in pleural infection. Aims and ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility of a full-scale trial of chest tube vs TT for pleural infection in a single UK centre. The primary outcome was defined as the acceptability of randomisation to patients.MethodsAdult patients admitted with a pleural effusion felt to be related to infection and meeting criteria for drainage (based on international guidelines) were eligible for randomisation. Participants were randomised (1:1) to chest tube insertion or TT with daily review assessing need for further drainages or other therapies. Neither participant nor clinician were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up at 90 days post-randomisation.ResultsFrom September 2019 to June 2021, 51 patients were diagnosed with pleural infection (complex parapneumonic effusion/empyema). Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria for trial and 10 patients were randomised (91%). The COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on recruitment. Data completeness was high in both groups with no protocol deviations.Patients randomised to TT had a significantly shorter overall mean hospital stay (5.4 days, SD 5.1) compared to the chest tube control group (13 days, SD 6.0), p=0.04. Total number of pleural procedures required per patient were similar, 1.2 in chest tube group and 1.4 in TT group. No patient required a surgical referral. Adverse events were similar between the groups with no readmissions related to pleural infection.ConclusionsThe ACTion trial met its pre-specified feasibility criteria for patient acceptability but other issues around feasibility of a full-scale trial remain. From the results available the hypothesis that TT can reduce length of stay in pleural infection should be explored further.Trial registrationISRCTN: 84674413 (registered 29/04/2019)

Impact of dexamethasone on persistent symptoms of COVID-19: an observational study (preprint)

Introduction Dexamethasone has been shown to reduce mortality for patients hospitalised with acute COVID-19 pneumonia. However, a significant proportion of patients suffer persistent symptoms following COVID-19 and little is known about the longer-term impact of this intervention on symptom burden. Methods Patients initially hospitalised with COVID-19 were prospectively recruited to an observational study (April-August 2020) with follow-up at 8 months (Dec 2020-April 2021) post-admission. A review of ongoing symptoms using a standardised systems-based proforma was performed alongside health-related quality of life assessment. In the UK, patients with COVID-19 (requiring oxygen) only received dexamethasone following the pre-print of the RECOVERY trial (June 2020), or as part of randomisation to that trial, allowing for a comparison between patients treated and not treated with dexamethasone. Results Between April to August 2020, 198 patients were recruited to this observational study. 87 required oxygen and were followed up at 8-months, so were eligible for this analysis. Of these 39 received an inpatient course of dexamethasone (cases) and 48 did not (controls). The groups were well matched at baseline in terms of age, comorbidity and frailty score. Over two-thirds of patients reported at least 1 ongoing symptom at 8-month follow-up. Patients in the dexamethasone group reported fewer symptoms (n=73, 1.9 per patient) than the non-dexamethasone group (n=152, 3.2 per patient) (p = 0.01). Conclusions In conclusion, in this case-control observational study, patients who received oral dexamethasone for hospitalised COVID-19 were less likely to experience persistent symptoms at 8-month follow-up. These are reassuring results for physicians administering dexamethasone to this patient group.

Are vaccines safe in patients with Long COVID? A prospective observational study. (preprint)

IntroductionAlthough the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination to prevent symptomatic COVID-19 is well established, there are no published studies on the impact on symptoms in patients with Long Covid. Anecdotal reports have suggested both a potential benefit and worsening of symptoms post vaccination with the uncertainty leading to some vaccine hesitancy amongst affected individuals. MethodsPatients initially hospitalised with COVID-19 were prospectively recruited to an observational study with clinical follow-up at 3 months (June-July 2020) and 8 months (Dec 2020-Jan 2021) post-admission. Participants who received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) or Oxford-AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine between January to February 2021 were identified and matched 2:1 (in terms of 8-month symptoms) with participants from the same cohort who were unvaccinated. All were re-assessed at 1 month post vaccination (or matched timepoint for unvaccinated cohort). Validated quality of life (SF-36), mental wellbeing (WEMWBS) and ongoing symptoms were assessed at all timepoints. Formal statistical analysis compared the effect of vaccination on recent quality of life using baseline symptoms, age, and gender in linear regression. ResultsForty-four vaccinated participants were assessed at a median of 32 days (IQR 20-41) post vaccination with 22 matched unvaccinated participants. Most were highly symptomatic of Long Covid at 8 months (82% in both groups had at least 1 persistent symptom), with fatigue (61%), breathlessness (50%) and insomnia (38%) predominating. There was no significant worsening in quality-of-life or mental wellbeing metrics pre versus post vaccination. Nearly two-thirds (n=27) reported transient (<72hr duration) systemic effects (including fever, myalgia and headache). When compared to matched unvaccinated participants from the same cohort, those who had receive a vaccine had a small overall improvement in Long Covid symptoms, with a decrease in worsening symptoms (5.6% vaccinated vs 14.2% unvaccinated) and increase in symptom resolution (23.2% vaccinated vs 15.4% unvaccinated) (p=0.035). No difference in response was identified between Pfizer-BioNTech or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines. ConclusionsReceipt of vaccination with either an mRNA or adenoviral vector vaccine was not associated with a worsening of Long Covid symptoms, quality of life, or mental wellbeing. Individuals with prolonged COVID-19 symptoms should receive vaccinations as suggested by national guidance.

Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up; results from a prospective UK cohort. (preprint)

Background: COVID19 causes a wide spectrum of disease. However, the incidence and severity of sequelae after the acute infection is uncertain. Data measuring the longer-term impact of COVID19 on symptoms, radiology and pulmonary function are urgently needed to inform patients and plan follow up services. Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalised with COVID19 were prospectively recruited to an observational cohort with outcomes recorded at 28 days. All were invited to a systematic follow up at 12 weeks, including chest radiograph, spirometry, exercise test, blood tests, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires. Findings: Between 30th March and 3rd June 2020, 163 patients with COVID19 were recruited. Median hospital length of stay was 5 days (IQR 2 to 8) and 30 patients required ITU or NIV, 19 patients died. At 12 weeks post admission, 134 were available for follow up and 110 attended. Most (74%) had persistent symptoms (notably breathlessness and excessive fatigue) with reduced HRQoL. Only patients with disease sufficiently severe to warrant oxygen therapy in hospital had abnormal radiology, clinical examination or spirometry at follow up. Thirteen (12%) patients had an abnormal chest X-ray with improvement in all but 2 from admission. Eleven (10%) had restrictive spirometry. Blood test abnormalities had returned to baseline in the majority (104/110). Interpretation: Patients with COVID19 remain highly symptomatic at 12 weeks, however, clinical abnormalities requiring action are infrequent, especially in those without a supplementary oxygen requirement during their acute illness. This has significant implications for physicians assessing patients with persistent symptoms, suggesting that a more holistic approach focussing on rehabilitation and general wellbeing is paramount. Funding: Southmead Hospital Charity